automated trading

Throughout 2024, we developed two portfolios to analyze system performance, and now it’s time to evaluate any errors. The second portfolio was assembled at the end of May with the following systems: Those that performed the worst were the ones trading in commodities. The rest of the systems performed quite satisfactorily, with no major additional observations. It’s clear that continuous systems in indexes with a solid track record tend to maintain it, with the U.S. […]

The title is intentional because a professional trader would take the time to read the person who writes about the systems they are using. Non-professionals, on the other hand, are still caught in the routine of constantly activating and deactivating the same system. Others change systems every two hours. This approach leads nowhere, and if someone is succeeding with it, I would appreciate an explanation of what the reasoning behind it is. A less serious

It’s interesting to have a trading system designed to operate in the Nasdaq, especially in derivatives like futures, for several reasons: In summary, a trading system designed for the Nasdaq, especially in futures, has high potential to generate capital due to the historical growth of the index, the leverage available in futures, and the ability to capture fast market moves. If the Nasdaq continues to grow as it has historically, the benefits of a well-designed

Managing a trading portfolio involves not only selecting the right systems but also understanding the inherent risks of their performance. One of the most relevant indicators for measuring risk is drawdown, a tool that evaluates the maximum accumulated drop from a historical peak to the next low in the portfolio balance. This concept is crucial for investors seeking to balance risks and returns efficiently. What is drawdown? Drawdown is defined as the maximum loss suffered